I read with interest the recent opinion piece (Oct 22, 2013) by a collection of BC university presidents, extolling the virtues of a
university education. Indeed, I am a university graduate, albeit of
many years ago. I generally support the notion of a university
education as a potential contribution to enrichment of our culture.
I am less convinced by the PR argument raised by the presidents,
particularly around the matters of critical thinking and the development
of an engaged and thoughtful citizenry. In my view -- even as the
presidents describe -- the university enterprise has become too focused
on turning out narrowly-defined, job-ready employees.
The article suggests that a university education today turns out
well-rounded, critical thinkers. This assertion falls flat in the face
of recent on-campus displays of student initiation programs rife with
sexist and racist themes, apparently replicated mindlessly year after
year by more senior students and orientation staff and faculty.
There seems to be some distance between the picture painted by the
presidents and what we observe on the ground. Most recently, the
explanation of the reason for including distasteful references to
indigenous peoples is that the students were basing their chant on
history learned from a Walt Disney animation movie...... Huh?
I do not think such empty-headed undertakings are fixed by more-direct
supervisory control of initiation and orientation programs. It strikes
me that universities need to re-introduce in all programs (business and
technical programs as well), curriculum elements that deal more broadly
with aspects of history, citizenship, arts and culture.
If we want thinking students and citizens, then universities need to
return to being more than technical schools. This does not happen
through selling us on the ideas that universities are working, but by
actually showing us that they are working.
No comments:
Post a Comment